Drake calls out LeBron James again in latest track “What Did I Miss?”

are very split on how to interpret this. Some believe the OVO mogul has every right to diss the basketball legend, whereas others think it’s a petty move. If you didn’t already know, Drake and LeBron James’ beef became a hot topic of social media speculation almost immediately after “Not Like Us” came out. Videos emerged of Bron dancing to it, and folks noticed how he stopped publicly commenting on the battle. Still, he seemed to support Kendrick, and a lot of lyrical and social media shade in the aftermath has fans thinking the former besties are frosty now.

In any case, Drake is clapping back against the haters and establishing his dominance on “What Did I Miss?” You might find that to be an ironic title since he hasn’t exactly let up any shade against Kendrick Lamar and company. But what The Boy missed were all the folks who turned on him despite their public support of him before. After all, he raps that he can’t say the whole situation didn’t surprise him to some extent. We’ll see if ICEMAN holds more direct reflections on the battle or if these will be our only shots of the cycle.

The article discusses Drake’s new song “What Did I Miss?” and how it seems to take aim at friends who betrayed him during the Kendrick Lamar beef. In the song, subtle jabs are made towards LeBron James, suggesting that the two may be at odds. Fans have differing opinions on whether Drake has the right to diss LeBron or if it’s unnecessary. The feud between Drake and LeBron has been a topic of speculation on social media, especially after the release of “Not Like Us.” Videos showing LeBron dancing to the song and his lack of public comments on the feud suggest a shift in their relationship.

Overall, the article reflects on the complexities of the ongoing feud between Drake and LeBron James and how it has sparked interest and discussion among fans. It remains to be seen whether Drake will delve further into this feud in his upcoming album or if this song will be the extent of his commentary on the matter.